No, I'm not objective on this subject. You know that. Still, I was heartened to read this, from John Henry:
↵↵↵One of (the) biggest issues we’ve had is that Bill James was a great resource for us but fell out of favor over the last few years for reasons I really don’t understand. We’ve gotten him more involved recently in the central process and that will help greatly.
↵
Michael Silverman thinks this is a really good idea. Dan Shaughnessy is, as ever, Dan Shaughnessy. Who are you? What do you think?
↵